Women Rights Denial by Governments and Individuals Essay

Women Rights Denial by Governments and Individuals - Essay Examplehe exclusion of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW) was adopted by the General Assembly in 1979 by votes of 130 to none, with 10 abstentionsAt the special ceremony that took place at the Copenhagen Conference on 17 July 1980, 64 postulates subscribe the Convention and two States submitted their instruments of ratification. On 3 September 1981, 30 days after the twentieth member- State had ratified it, the Convention entered into force - faster than any previous human rights convention had done - then bringing to a climax United Nations efforts to codify comprehensively international legal standards for women. 1Its content is carve up into four parts. The first part deals with the concept of human rights. It presents the evolution and expansion of this concept and its philosophical formulations and suppositional reflection on the nature and sources of human rights. International standards in the next two parts be grouped, first, from the point of view of categories of human rights civil, political, economic, social and cultural, and then in relation to the protection of certain categories of compromising persons (women, children, minorities, indigenous people and migrant workers). 2There has been a growing realization that the definition of human rights postulate to be revised to fully include womens rights in it. The International Womens Conference in Beijing in 1995, was another landmark achievement in this direction. After much dispute and heated debate, the final course of study of action stated, While the significance of national and religious particularities in various historical, cultural, and religious systems must be kept in mind, it is the duty of states regardless of their political, economic, and cultural systems to protect and promote all human... This essay describes the womens lib and the fight for womens rights as an epic saga that is still happening today. Whatever success has been achieved has been purely by dint of assiduity on part of the feminists. The researcher discontinues his opinion on the topic and states that it is unfortunate that, at times, governments and individuals fail to agnize these rights, even in 21st century. In fact it has been justly argued that resolutions against whaling were passed more quickly and unanimously than resolutions for womens rights. The researcher mentiones that feminists efforts to introduce a homogenous standard may be admirable, but may withal be misplaced. It is a matter of debate that rights in one culture may be interpreted as oppression in another culture today. For example, even wearing a scarf is considered a religious obligation and a feminine trait in Muslim society but is considered persecution in Western society. Similarly wearing a skimpy bikini on the beach may give rise to a furor even in conservative Catholic communities. The invasion of multiculturism, that was described in the essay is also a force to contend with. To conclude, the researcher explores that many countries allow different communities living(a) there to preserve their culture today. In such a situation present homogeneity may itself be an infringement on the cultural freedom of that community. A more pragmatic approach is need today when dealing with issues related to different cultures and religions.